Whatever
Reader comment on: N.Y. Appeals Court Opens Door to 'Libel Tourism'

Submitted by Chris, Dec 22, 2007 00:09

If the court in New York has no jurisdiction over Mahfouz, then it stands to reason the the British court has no jurisdiction over Ms. Ehrenfeld. They have no mechanism to enforce the decision, so my advice is just ignore it and move on.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title	By	Date
Is this the final wakeup call? [161 words]	Patricia Levy	Dec 22, 2007 02:58
⇒ Whatever [44 words]	Chris	Dec 22, 2007 00:09
Bruce is right [96 words]	Jim O'Sullivan	Dec 21, 2007 10:30
Right Argument, Wrong Venue [55 words]	Art Fougner MD	Dec 21, 2007 08:07
This story is overblown [58 words]	Bruce	Dec 21, 2007 00:29
Just what protects professionals like Ms. Ehrenfeld? [153 words]	John House	Dec 20, 2007 21:18
↔ It doesn't matter what happens in a British court [38 words]	Rob	Dec 21, 2007 20:30
Court afraid of bin Mahfouz? [11 words]	Yankee Doodle	Dec 20, 2007 20:08
Re: NYCOA decision on libel tourism [22 words]	Mark Jaeger	Dec 20, 2007 19:45
A dangerous precendent [109 words]	Scott Baker	Dec 20, 2007 17:22
↔ Outrageous! [79 words]	Claudine Guay	Dec 21, 2007 11:23

Comment on N.Y. Appeals Court Opens Door to 'Libel Tourism'

Name:	Email Address: Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments:
Comments: Mark my comment as a response to Whatever by reader Chris
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable. Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.