CONTACT US   SUBSCRIBE   PREMIUM   ADVERTISING

74F Hi 84F
Lo 64F

Recent Blog Posts

Reader comment on:
Clue for the Court?

Submitted by terry albertson, Nov 27, 2007 09:59

Ultimately,the Supreme Court gains nothing by re-reading the Massachusetts State Constitution. Their source document for consideration in this case is the national Constitution,and if Massachusetts chose to state as part of their originating document that no-one had the right to self-defense,not only would it be stupid,it simply wouldn't matter.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

Of course, the state and federal constittions are not the same document, but Maine's would be hard to misinterpret with... [MORE]

isirajo 

Nov 27, 2007 20:54

John Adams, author of the Massachusettes Constitution, and its included Declaration of Rights, wrote in Article 1: "... the right... [MORE]

jcr 

Nov 27, 2007 15:41

As a Jewess in the US, I just want to ask: Shouldn't we ALL put our precious 2nd Amendment FIRST?... [MORE]

Wendy Weinbaum 

Nov 27, 2007 13:20

Ultimately,the Supreme Court gains nothing by re-reading the Massachusetts State Constitution. Their source document for consideration in this case is...

terry albertson 

Nov 27, 2007 09:59

i've pushed the answer on every person i know,the n.r.a.,glenn beck and my state's elected offices.i found the answer.this case... [MORE]

scott cockrell 

Nov 27, 2007 04:35

I believe the Founding Fathers meant, "What is true of every member of the society, individually, is true of them... [MORE]

John Ebanks 

Nov 26, 2007 23:04

The U.S. Senate actually debated adding "for the common defence" to the Second Amendment, and chose not to do so.... [MORE]

Clayton E. Cramer 

Nov 26, 2007 13:32

If the framers of the constitution wanted to protect only an armies right to bear arms, there would be no... [MORE]

brokenbarrel 

Nov 26, 2007 12:34

The Second Amendment is deliberately different from the Massachusetts constitution regarding the very phrase you mention. On September 9, 1789,... [MORE]

Professor Joseph Olson 

Nov 26, 2007 12:22

Everywhere in the articles, people means just that, PEOPLE. There were no standing militias, only farmers and storekeepers running to... [MORE]

chuck higgins 

Nov 26, 2007 08:53

Comment on Clue for the Court?

    Before submitting your comment, please provide a valid email address to complete the verification process.

    Fall Education
    A New York Sun Advertorial Section

    NEW YORK ›

    Report: Real Estate Subsidies Draining City Coffers

    City: Staten Island Man Dead From West Nile Virus

    Arrest Furthers a Real Estate Star's Fall

    Big Increase in Unemployment Could Tax State's Resources

    State Finds Labor Violations At Saratoga Race Track

    City Taps Another Strength, Wins Drinking Water Contest

    NATIONAL ›

    Gustav Kills 59, Southeast States on High Alert

    Feds Take Over Probe of Alleged Obama Threat

    'Obama Is the Man for This Job'

    Drama on Floor as Clinton Cuts Roll Call Vote

    Al-Arian Files Habeas for Release

    Soros Behind Marijuana Decriminalization in Mass.

    ARTS+ ›

    Hirst Dealer: No 'Mountain' of Unsold Works

    Political Ephemera Through the Ages

    Michael Phelps To Present at MTV Awards

    The Art World Embraces the Wow Factor

    Also Opening This Weekend: 'Young People F---ing'

    To Venice: Some Unsolicited Advice