There was no Southern "rebellion"
Reader comment on: The Copperheads

Submitted by Michael Hill, Apr 25, 2007 12:13

The South had (and has) every right to secede from the voluntary union of States. Thus there was no rebellion to put down. There was only an unjust invasion of the South. To hell with Lincoln and the modern tyranny he sired.

Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Submit a comment on this article

Other reader comments on this article

Title	By	Date
If even neocons say the problem is the Bush administration's lack of management ability how can this war possibly be won? [197 words]	My Country Right or Wrong -- but let's correct the wrongs	Apr 25, 2007 16:53
⇒ There was no Southern "rebellion" [42 words]	Michael Hill	Apr 25, 2007 12:13
Greek Fire [146 words]	Donkeyhue	Apr 24, 2007 15:59
What about incorrectly declaring victory [49 words]	Jerry Skurnik	Apr 23, 2007 16:23
O, I see - you think it proper to have coerced the South back into a union they had rejected. Interesting. [15 words]	Lee Pefley	Apr 23, 2007 15:28
The Copperheads [41 words]	gregdn	Apr 23, 2007 09:31
Copperheads and history [32 words]	Sid Morris	Apr 23, 2007 08:21

Comment on The Copperheads

Name:	Email Address: Email me if someone replies to my comment
Title of Comments:
Comments: Mark my comment as a response to There was no Southern "rebellion" by reader Michael Hill
Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable. Click here to see the top 25 recent comments.