CONTACT US   SUBSCRIBE   PREMIUM   ADVERTISING

84F Hi 94F
Lo 76F

Recent Blog Posts

I am the inventor of the silent-running submarine technology and I am even not a US citizen.
Reader comment on: U.S. Stance in Spy Case Sparks Concern in Academia

Submitted by Bernard J. Ebacher, Apr 3, 2007 22:53

I am the inventor of the technology stolen by Chi Mak, the chinese engineer, and I am not a US citizen.

After the US Navy decided that this would be wonderful for the submarines, the project became classified and l lost my job (or should I say, got fired). The company I was working for, which is not the company that the chinese engineer stole my stuff from (how did they get that.....?......hum.....), did not want to let me use that technology to earn my living if I was going to leave the company so I told them that i prefer to make it public knowledge, and that is how it became public knowledge. However, I developed a much, much better version since, which I never unveilled to anyone. Should I patent it and tell the world how to do it? Then the chinese could go on internet and read the patent and know how to do it. This is so ridiculous.

Not so many people need a virtually undetectable submarines, right? But i still need a job and even today, the immigration laws not allowing me to apply for citizenship, i could not get my job back. So why should I give my real invention to the US government while I am still struggling to find a job in this country.

All the positions in my field of work are in China now. Should I go to China to find a job? Maybe they need the inventor himself to build their next generation submarines, and then give themselves a system capable of delivering an atomic bomb under the nose of the US Navy, without being detected. I just hope that one day the US will wake up and find out that the only way to keep a technological advantage is to care about the beautiful mind living her so they don't have to leave the country to survive.


Note: Comments are screened, and in some cases edited, before posting. We reserve the right to reject anything we find objectionable.

Other reader comments on this article

Comment By Date

I am the inventor of the technology stolen by Chi Mak, the chinese engineer, and I am not a US...

Bernard J. Ebacher 

Apr 3, 2007 22:53

  

Dear Mr. Bernard J. Ebacher,

Some would argue that the prosecution of mr. Mak is part of a wider effort by... [MORE]

jonathan m. katcher 

May 11, 2007 03:27

Comment on U.S. Stance in Spy Case Sparks Concern in Academia

    Dog Days of Summer
    A New York Sun Advertorial Section

    NEW YORK ›

    Tax Rates For New Yorkers Would Top 50% Under Obama

    Paterson Implies 'Accidental' Racism

    An Apparent Heir to Weingarten Emerges at N.Y. Teachers Union

    Merrill Lynch Move Could Spark Silverstein-Port Authority Battle

    Obama Is Right About Something

    Donor Sought for Visitor Center To Be Built at Lincoln Center

    NATIONAL ›

    US, Iraq Seek 'General Time Horizon' on Troop Cuts

    Bloomberg Backs Paterson on the Amazon Tax Question

    Guns Ruling Spawns Challenges by Felons

    Bush Library Project Clears an Important Methodist Hurdle

    Human Trial of AIDS Vaccine Canceled

    Gore Calls for Electricity Overhaul

    ARTS+ ›

    Produce & Public Art at Port Authority

    It's Our Earth, Now What Do We Do With It?

    The World Inside Our Heads: 'Human' by Michael Gazzaniga

    Man-Eaters: Carole Travis-Henikoff's 'Dinner With a Cannibal'

    'The Human Condition' — in 10 Hours

    Movies in Brief: 'Felon'